ASC 970
Active
ASC 970 – Real Estate–General
Governs preacquisition costs, development costs, interest capitalization, and selling cost capitalization for real estate projects.
1
Conceptual Framework Linkage
Matching development-phase costs to the projects and units they benefit
Real estate development involves a long sequence of costs – PREACQUISITION, land DEVELOPMENT, CONSTRUCTION, and eventual SELLING costs – often spanning MULTIPLE individual units or phases within a single project. ASC 970 addresses WHEN these costs should be CAPITALISED versus expensed, and HOW capitalised costs should be ALLOCATED across individual units when a project is sold off in pieces (Section 8).
2
Scope
Real estate developers and general real estate cost accounting
ASC 970 applies to entities involved in the DEVELOPMENT, CONSTRUCTION, and SALE of real estate projects, providing general guidance later supplemented by more industry-specific real estate Topics (CIRAs, REITs, retail land, timeshares).
3
Preacquisition Costs – Capitalization Criteria
Capitalised only if directly identifiable with a specific, probable project
Costs incurred BEFORE acquiring a specific parcel of real estate (e.g. an option payment, feasibility study, or environmental assessment) are CAPITALISED only if they are DIRECTLY IDENTIFIABLE with a SPECIFIC property, would otherwise be CAPITALISED if the property were already owned, and ACQUISITION of the property (or another suitable option) is deemed PROBABLE – otherwise, such costs are EXPENSED as incurred, reflecting genuine uncertainty about whether the eventual project will proceed.
4
Land Development and Construction Costs
Direct costs building toward a saleable or rentable asset
Costs of LAND DEVELOPMENT (grading, utilities, roads) and CONSTRUCTION are CAPITALISED as part of the real estate project's cost, consistent with general asset capitalisation principles – accumulated until the project (or individual units within it) are complete and ready for sale or occupancy.
5
Capitalization of Interest and Taxes During Development
Applying ASC 835's general interest capitalization framework
Real estate under DEVELOPMENT/construction is a classic "QUALIFYING ASSET" under ASC 835 (see the companion poster) – interest cost incurred during the development period is CAPITALISED as part of the project's cost, rather than expensed. Property TAXES and INSURANCE costs incurred during the development period are SIMILARLY capitalised (rather than expensed), reflecting that these are genuine costs of bringing the project to a saleable/rentable condition.
6
Selling Costs – Capitalizable Only If Directly Related and Recoverable
A narrow capitalization window, tied to specific sales
Costs of SELLING real estate (e.g. sales commissions, model unit costs) are CAPITALISED only if they are DIRECTLY related to, and their recovery is REASONABLY expected from, the sale of the specific real estate – otherwise, general marketing and advertising-type selling costs are EXPENSED as incurred, consistent with GENERAL cost-of-obtaining-a-contract principles (ASC 340-40).
7
Sales of Real Estate – Now Governed by ASC 606
Legacy industry-specific sale recognition rules replaced by the general control-transfer model
Revenue from SALES of real estate is now recognised under ASC 606's GENERAL control-transfer model – a genuine SIMPLIFICATION compared to legacy, real-estate-industry-SPECIFIC recognition rules that PREVIOUSLY existed (with their own bright-line down payment percentages and continuing involvement tests). Under CURRENT guidance, real estate sale recognition is analysed like any other ASC 606 contract – assessing when CONTROL of the property transfers to the buyer, and evaluating COLLECTIBILITY as part of the general contract existence criteria, WITHOUT industry-specific bright-line thresholds.
8
Cost Allocation for Multiple-Unit Real Estate Projects
The relative sales value method
When a SINGLE real estate project (e.g. a subdivision or condominium building) contains MULTIPLE individual units sold at DIFFERENT times and prices, total project costs are typically ALLOCATED to individual units using the "RELATIVE SALES VALUE" method – allocating cost in proportion to each unit's estimated relative SALES value compared to the total project's estimated sales value, rather than allocating costs equally per unit or based on square footage alone.
9
Worked Example – Preacquisition Cost Capitalization
Capitalising costs tied to a probable acquisition
Example: A feasibility study before purchasing land
A developer incurs $150,000 for a feasibility study and environmental assessment on a specific parcel it has under a purchase OPTION, with acquisition deemed PROBABLE given advanced negotiations and secured financing commitments.
Since the costs are DIRECTLY identifiable with this SPECIFIC parcel and acquisition is deemed PROBABLE, the $150,000 is CAPITALISED as a preacquisition cost – to be included in the project's total cost basis once the acquisition closes.
10
Worked Example – Relative Sales Value Cost Allocation
Allocating shared project costs proportionately
Example: A 10-unit condominium project
A developer incurs $8,000,000 of total project costs for a 10-unit condominium building. Unit A has an estimated sales value of $600,000, while the TOTAL estimated sales value of all 10 units combined is $6,000,000.
Unit A's allocated cost = $8,000,000 × ($600,000 ÷ $6,000,000) = $8,000,000 × 10% = $800,000 – Unit A is allocated a PROPORTIONATE share of total project costs based on its relative SALES VALUE, rather than an equal per-unit share.
11
Disclosure Requirements
What ASC 970 requires
Capitalisation policies for preacquisition, development, and selling costsInterest and taxes capitalised during the development periodCost allocation methodology used for multiple-unit projects
12
Critical Judgments & Estimates
Where judgement matters most
SIGNIFICANT JUDGEMENTS
Whether acquisition of a specific property is probable, supporting preacquisition cost capitalisationWhether selling costs are directly related to and recoverable from a specific sale
SIGNIFICANT ESTIMATES
Relative sales values of individual units within a multi-unit project
13
ASC 970 vs IFRS – Comparison
Comparison – ASC 970 vs general IFRS principles
FeatureUS GAAP (ASC 970)IFRS (General Principles)
Real estate sale revenue recognitionASC 606 control transferIFRS 15 control transfer – converged, since legacy industry-specific rules were replaced on both sides
Interest capitalisation during developmentASC 835 qualifying asset frameworkIAS 23 borrowing costs – broadly converged core principle
Relative sales value cost allocationCommon, described methodNo dedicated named method, but general cost allocation principles achieve similar outcomes
Real estate sale revenue recognition is one of the more thoroughly CONVERGED industry areas, given that BOTH frameworks moved from older, real-estate-specific bright-line rules to the SAME general control-transfer model.
14
Statement Mapping
Where every ASC 970 event lands
EventStatement(s) affectedNotes
Capitalised development costsBSAccumulated as project cost, allocated to units upon sale
Real estate saleBS ISRevenue and cost of sales recognised upon control transfer
15
Related Topics
Cross-reference map
TopicConnection
ASC 835Supplies the interest capitalisation framework applied during real estate development
ASC 606Supplies the control-transfer revenue recognition model for real estate sales
ASC 976 / 978Retail Land Sales and Time-Sharing Activities – related, more specialised real estate sale Topics building on this general framework
16
Quick-Reference Glossary
Preacquisition costs
Costs incurred before acquiring a specific property, capitalised only if directly identifiable with the property and acquisition is probable.
Relative sales value method
A cost allocation method assigning shared project costs to individual units in proportion to their estimated relative sales values.
Financial statement key
BS Balance sheet
IS Income statement
SE Statement of changes in equity
OCI Other comprehensive income
SCF Statement of cash flows