IFRS 11
Active
Joint Arrangements
Prescribes the accounting for interests in joint arrangements, distinguishing joint operations from joint ventures.
1
Conceptual Framework Linkage
Why classification follows RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS, not legal form
The Conceptual Framework's asset/liability definitions ask what an entity genuinely CONTROLS or OWES. IFRS 11 applies this directly to joint arrangements: classification depends on the parties' RIGHTS to assets and OBLIGATIONS for liabilities of the arrangement, NOT on the legal structure alone – even a separate legal vehicle can be a "joint operation" if the parties' rights/obligations relate directly to the underlying assets/liabilities.
HOW IFRS 11 MAPS TO THE FRAMEWORK
Substance over form – a separate legal vehicle does NOT automatically mean the parties only have a net equity interest; contractual terms can preserve direct rights/obligations Faithful representation – joint operators recognise THEIR OWN share of assets/liabilities directly, reflecting genuine direct exposure, rather than a single net investment figure Comparability – replacing IAS 31's proportionate consolidation CHOICE with a single mandatory equity method for joint ventures removed a major comparability weakness
IFRS 11 was issued alongside IFRS 10 and IFRS 12 as part of a coordinated "consolidation package," directly replacing IAS 31 and its criticised policy-choice structure.
The two-category structure
IFRS 11 replaced IAS 31's three structural forms with just TWO categories, each with a single mandatory accounting treatment.
TypeAccounting
Joint operationEach party recognises its OWN share of assets, liabilities, revenue, expenses directly
Joint ventureMANDATORY equity method (IAS 28) – NO proportionate consolidation option
Removing the IAS 31 CHOICE for joint ventures directly improved comparability, at some cost to the granularity IAS 31's proportionate consolidation once provided.
2
Scope & Applicability
What IFRS 11 covers
IFRS 11 applies to ALL entities that are a PARTY to a joint arrangement – an arrangement of which two or more parties have JOINT CONTROL.
A joint arrangement has two essential characteristics: parties are bound by a CONTRACTUAL ARRANGEMENT, and that contractual arrangement gives two or more parties JOINT CONTROL.
Key definitions you must know
Joint control
The contractually agreed sharing of control, which exists ONLY when decisions about relevant activities require the UNANIMOUS consent of the parties sharing control.
Joint operation
A joint arrangement whereby parties with joint control have RIGHTS to the ASSETS and OBLIGATIONS for the LIABILITIES relating to the arrangement.
Joint venture
A joint arrangement whereby parties with joint control have RIGHTS to the NET ASSETS of the arrangement.
3
Joint Control – The Threshold
Unanimous consent – a genuinely high bar
An entity assesses whether ALL the parties, or a GROUP of the parties, control the arrangement COLLECTIVELY (per IFRS 10's control definition), and then whether decisions about RELEVANT ACTIVITIES require the UNANIMOUS consent of those parties sharing control.
Example 1: Testing for unanimous consent
Three parties hold 40%, 35%, and 25% of the voting rights in an arrangement. The contractual agreement requires decisions about relevant activities to be approved by AT LEAST 75% of the voting rights.
NO single party can unilaterally approve decisions (none holds 75% alone), but multiple DIFFERENT combinations of two parties CAN reach 75% (e.g. 40%+35%=75%, or 40%+25%... does not reach 75% alone with only two, need to check: 40+35=75, 35+25=60, 40+25=65). Since MORE THAN ONE combination of parties could together reach the required percentage, NO single combination has EXCLUSIVE joint control – this arrangement likely does NOT meet the joint control threshold, since unanimous consent of a SPECIFIC identifiable set of parties is not established.
4
Classifying the Arrangement
Structure, legal form, contractual terms, and other facts
Classification as a joint operation or joint venture depends on the parties' RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS arising from the arrangement, assessed by considering: the STRUCTURE of the arrangement (separate vehicle or not); when structured through a separate vehicle, the LEGAL FORM of that vehicle; the terms of the CONTRACTUAL ARRANGEMENT; and, when relevant, OTHER FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES.
An arrangement NOT structured through a separate vehicle is ALWAYS a joint operation – the separate vehicle analysis (Section 7) only becomes necessary once a distinct legal entity/vehicle exists.
5
Joint Operations Accounting
Recognising the joint operator's OWN direct share
A joint operator recognises, in relation to its interest: its ASSETS, including its share of any assets held jointly; its LIABILITIES, including its share of any liabilities incurred jointly; its REVENUE from the sale of its share of output; its share of REVENUE from the sale of output by the joint operation; and its EXPENSES, including its share of any expenses incurred jointly.
Example 2: A joint operation in oil exploration
Two companies jointly operate an oil field through a contractual arrangement (no separate vehicle), each entitled to 50% of extracted oil and jointly liable for decommissioning costs. Company A's own extraction costs for the period: $2,000,000. Jointly incurred decommissioning provision: $6,000,000.
Company A recognises its OWN $2,000,000 extraction costs directly, PLUS its 50% share of the joint decommissioning liability = 6,000,000 × 50% = $3,000,000, recognised directly on ITS OWN SOFP – no separate joint venture entity accounting is needed.
6
Joint Ventures Accounting
Mandatory equity method – no alternative
A joint venturer recognises its interest in a joint venture as an INVESTMENT, and accounts for that investment using the EQUITY METHOD in accordance with IAS 28 – UNLESS the entity is exempted from applying the equity method per IAS 28's own scope exceptions (e.g. certain investment entities, or entities meeting specific parent-level exemption conditions).
This is a DIRECT departure from IAS 31 – there is NO proportionate consolidation option available for joint ventures under IFRS 11, regardless of preparer preference.
7
Separate Vehicle Assessment – The Key Judgement
When a separate vehicle can STILL be a joint operation
Even where an arrangement IS structured through a separate vehicle, it can still be a JOINT OPERATION if the LEGAL FORM, contractual terms, or OTHER FACTS/CIRCUMSTANCES indicate the parties have rights to assets and obligations for liabilities (rather than merely rights to net assets).
Example 3: A separate vehicle that is still a joint operation
Two companies establish a separate legal entity to construct and operate a pipeline. Although the pipeline is legally owned by the separate entity, the contractual arrangement specifies that the OUTPUT (transported gas capacity) is entirely allocated to the two parties in proportion to their interests, and each party is contractually obligated to fund the entity's operating costs and any cash shortfalls in that SAME proportion.
Despite the SEPARATE legal vehicle, the CONTRACTUAL TERMS give each party DIRECT rights to substantially all the output and DIRECT obligations to fund costs – this indicates the arrangement is a JOINT OPERATION, NOT a joint venture, despite the separate legal entity's existence. Each party accounts for its own share of assets/liabilities/revenue/expenses directly, per Section 5.
This is one of the MOST heavily tested and counter-intuitive aspects of IFRS 11 – a separate legal vehicle does NOT automatically mean joint venture (equity method) treatment; the underlying CONTRACTUAL substance can still produce joint OPERATION accounting.
8
Accounting for Parties Without Joint Control
Participants who lack joint control
A party participating in, but NOT having joint control of, a joint operation ALSO accounts for its interest in the assets, liabilities, revenue, and expenses relating to its involvement, IF it has rights to assets and obligations for liabilities. A party participating in, but not having joint control of, a joint VENTURE accounts for its interest per IFRS 9 (as a financial asset), UNLESS it has SIGNIFICANT INFLUENCE, in which case IAS 28's equity method applies instead.
9
Disclosure Requirements
Required disclosures (largely detailed further in IFRS 12)
Nature, extent, and financial effects of interests in joint arrangements, including the name, principal place of business, and proportion of ownership interest Nature of the relationship with the joint arrangement (e.g. description of activities, strategic nature) Significant judgements made in determining joint control and classification as a joint operation or joint venture
10
Critical Judgments & Estimates
Where management judgement matters most
SIGNIFICANT JUDGEMENTS
Whether unanimous consent genuinely exists among an identifiable group of parties Classifying a separate-vehicle arrangement as a joint operation vs joint venture based on contractual substance
SIGNIFICANT ESTIMATES
Allocating shared assets/liabilities/costs between joint operators where contractual terms require estimation
The separate vehicle classification judgement (Section 7) is consistently one of the most challenging and frequently misapplied areas of the entire consolidation suite.
11
IFRS vs US GAAP
Comparison – IFRS 11 vs US GAAP
FeatureIFRS (IFRS 11)US GAAP
Joint venture accountingMANDATORY equity method onlyEquity method is also the general approach, though proportionate consolidation is permitted in SOME specific industries (e.g. certain oil and gas/construction arrangements) under US GAAP
Classification driverRights and obligations (structure, legal form, contractual terms, other facts)Similar substance-based analysis, though with different specific guidance
US GAAP retains a NARROW proportionate consolidation option in specific industries that IFRS 11 does not permit at all – a residual divergence despite otherwise broadly similar philosophy.
12
Statement Mapping
Comprehensive event-to-statement mapping table
Event / transactionStatement(s) affectedNotes
Joint operation – own/shared assets, liabilitiesSOFPRecognised directly, per the operator's contractual share
Joint operation – own/shared revenue, expensesSOPLRecognised directly, per contractual entitlement
Joint venture investment recognitionSOFPSingle equity-method investment line (IAS 28)
Joint venture share of profit/lossSOPLRecognised via equity method, adjusting investment carrying amount
Significant judgements, classification, ownership detailsNotesMandatory disclosure
13
Related Standards
Cross-reference map
StandardConnection
IFRS 10Supplies the underlying "control" concept used to assess joint control collectively
IAS 28Supplies the mandatory equity method mechanics for joint ventures
IFRS 12Supplies detailed disclosure requirements for interests in joint arrangements
IAS 24Joint ventures/operations and their operators are related parties requiring disclosure
Quick-reference glossary
Separate vehicle
A separately identifiable financial structure, including separate legal entities or entities recognised by statute, regardless of whether those entities have separate legal personality.
Party to a joint arrangement
An entity participating in a joint arrangement, regardless of whether it has joint control.
14
Quick-Reference Glossary
Joint control
The contractually agreed sharing of control, which exists ONLY when decisions about relevant activities require the UNANIMOUS consent of the parties sharing control.
Joint operation
A joint arrangement whereby parties with joint control have RIGHTS to the ASSETS and OBLIGATIONS for the LIABILITIES relating to the arrangement.
Joint venture
A joint arrangement whereby parties with joint control have RIGHTS to the NET ASSETS of the arrangement.
Separate vehicle
A separately identifiable financial structure, including separate legal entities or entities recognised by statute, regardless of whether those entities have separate legal personality.
Party to a joint arrangement
An entity participating in a joint arrangement, regardless of whether it has joint control.
Unanimous consent
The requirement that decisions about relevant activities must be approved by all parties sharing control – the defining threshold for joint control.
Financial statement key
BS Balance sheet
IS Income statement
SE Statement of changes in equity
OCI Other comprehensive income
SCF Statement of cash flows
History & Development
Apr-2001
In April 2001 the International Accounting Standards Board (Board) adopted IAS 31 Financial Reporting of Interests in Joint Ventures, which had originally been issued by the International Accounting Standards Committee in December 1990.
Dec-2003
In December 2003 the Board amended and renamed IAS 31 with a new title-Interests in Joint Ventures. This amendment was done in conjunction with amendments to IAS 27 Consolidated Financial Statements and Accounting for Investments in Subsidiaries and IAS 28 Accounting for Investments in Associates.
May-2011
In May 2011 the Board issued IFRS 11 Joint Arrangements to replace IAS 31.
May-2011
IFRS 12 Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities, also issued in May 2011, replaced the disclosure requirements in IAS 31. IFRS 11 incorporated the guidance contained in a related Interpretation (SIC-13 Jointly Controlled Entities-Non-Monetary Contributions by Venturers).
Jun-2012
In June 2012 IFRS 11 was amended by Consolidated Financial Statements, Joint Arrangements and Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities: Transition Guidance (Amendments to IFRS 10, IFRS 11 and IFRS 12). These amendments provided additional transition relief to IFRS 11, limiting the requirement to present adjusted comparative information to only the annual period immediately preceding the first annual period for which IFRS 11 is applied.
May-2014
In May 2014 the Board amended IFRS 11 to provide guidance on the accounting for acquisitions of interests in joint operations in which the activity constitutes a business.
Dec-2017
Annual Improvements to IFRS Standards 2015-2017 Cycle
Minor consequential amendment to IFRS 11